Overview
The Electrical and Instrumentation Department trains and educates students
to satisfy job
requirements in the electrical and instrumentation industries.
The department
offers the following certificates and degrees:
• Electrical Technology Certificate of Achievement.
• AAS in Electrical Technology.
• Certificate in Instrumentation Technology.
• Core Technology in Instrumentation Emphasis for Bachelor of Applied Science.
The
Electrical Technology Certificate and AAS prepares students for employment
as an industrial
electrician. The emphasis of the program is to help individuals to develop
the competencies expected
of electrical/construction apprentices. This rationale was developed with
significant input by an
advisory committee, comprised of people active in the mining and construction
industries.
The Instrumentation Technology
Certificate prepares students for employment as an electrical/instrumentation
technician.
The Instrumentation
Certificate
requires an AAS or a Certificate in
electrical technology as a prerequisite. Students who complete the Instrumentation
Certificate have
completed their technology core courses for a GBC Bachelor’s of Applied
Science. (See BAS section.)
The technical programs utilize National Electrical Code guidelines and ISA
Standards for class
assessment, reviewed and approved by the advisory board. The course hours are
dedicated to
providing required academic standards in the field in the minimum time.
Faculty. There are three full-time instructors in the department:
FACULTY
Instructor
Name |
Education |
Title |
GBC Years
of Service |
| Steve Garcia |
AS — Dixie College
BS, MS — Northern Arizona University |
Electrical Technology Professor
(13 years experience) |
8 |
| Bob Byram |
Military Electronics Schools |
(20 years experience) |
6 |
| Bob Robertson |
BS — Electrical
Engineering, University of Utah
MS — Industrial Education, Brigham Young
University |
Instrumentation Instructor
(26 years experience) |
3 |
*Approximate years teaching elsewhere or professional related work experience.
The three faculty bring nearly 70 years experience in their fields. With this
industrial background,
current teaching and training methods are utilized to maximize the time and
resources available. An
advisory board of local industry and business leaders confer with the faculty
and provide an
evaluation of training quality and depth. Faculty attend national conferences
each year to upgrade
teaching skills and to remain abreast of teaching methodologies for continual
improvement. Adjuncts
are not currently used in either program.
Students. The
department serves recent high-school graduates and/or currently employed
job-upgrade or career-change candidates in the electrical field. Graduates
of the Electrical
Technology program and/or students with equivalent work experience are funneled
into the
Instrumentation program. Enrollment in electrical has varied between 20 to
40 students entering the
program, with about a 70 percent retention rate. Instrumentation has varied
between 8 to 12 students
starting the program, with about an 80 percent retention. Drop-outs come from
students unable to
keep the pace of the first year’s activities and from job opportunities
taken because of skills acquired
during the program prior to graduation. In Fall 2002, 28 students were enrolled
in electrical,
including a group of Newmont Mining Company employees, and five were enrolled
in the
instrumentation program.
Resources. The physical plant is in the old Builders
Mart downtown, where there are two
conventional classrooms, two labs, and one combination classroom/computer
lab. The program
utilizes videos and text material which the library provides on long-term
arrangements for use
off-campus. Computers are available in a lab, providing Internet access for
student research and
study. There is a $5,000 annual operating budget. In the electrical/instrumentation
labs there are
three to eight learning stations, depending on the course. In order for the
instrumentation training to
be totally up-to-date and cutting edge, $300,000-400,000 would be required
for equipment. Much
instructor/student time has been spent over the years in constructing the
labs. A new building is fairly
high on the state list for building construction, with approval possible
by the 2003 or 2005 legislature,
depending upon the financial health of the State of Nevada .
Significant Changes
Instrumentation. The most significant change has been the development of
the Instrumentation
program in the past three years as an adjunct to the electrical program.
Such a program had been
discussed informally over a period of many years and when the instructors
developed a plan, it
received the approval and support of the advisory committee as well as subsequent
college and system
level approvals.
Bachelor of Applied Science.
Instrumentation was the second program—after
management—to be
included in the new Bachelor of Applied Science program. The instrumentation
instructor developed
300-400 level technical courses for this degree.
Placement. Students graduating from the electrical/instrumentation
program have found strong
support from local industry in obtaining entry-level positions. Many previous
graduates are now in
supervisory positions where the support is strengthened.
Analysis
The department has successfully taken the two-fold challenge (support local
industry and the higher
level academic goals in the College) by implementing the instrumentation
program. This has been the
first technology for the Bachelor of Applied Science as well as supported
local industry with a second
entry level skill base.
A problem must be addressed with regard to math requirements
for the electrical students. That is, it
is problematic to require identical math curricula for AAS students in electrical
technology as for other
disciplines that are going for higher-level degrees. For instance, technical
math must deal more with
depth than breadth. Time must be spent mastering the applied math skills
relevant to the trade being
studied. Whereas, a general ed focus must be exposed to more variety leading
to a broader view. This
means there is a fundamental difference between these two camps. It is a
mistake to think that one size
fits all. One is not better nor worse, they are different.
STRENGTHS
• Strong capabilities for developing new programs.
• Knowledgeable, experienced instructional staff.
WEAKNESSES
• Off-campus location limits contact with other instructors and support
services.
RECOMMENDATIONS/ACTION ITEMS
• Develop ways for electrical/instrumentation to learn math skills needed
in their profession.
• Investigate feasibility of developing training in low voltage systems
(security and fire alarms).
• With the leadership of the College, create improved marketing and recruiting
programs for
electrical/instrumentation students, one that appropriately and accurately
portrays technology
programs.
• Begin planning for the possibility that the 2003 Nevada Legislature will
appropriate funds for a
new electrical technology building on campus. |