Overview
The Great Basin College Science Department serves the GBC mission in several
capacities—delivery
of general education courses, university transfer courses, courses for technical-vocational
programs, and
professional development and community service offerings. Courses are offered
in physical science,
biology, and environmental science.
The primary role of the department
is to provide quality general education courses for the arts and
sciences and lower-division science courses for transfer by science majors
to a baccalaureate program.
Typical general education and transfer courses are CHEM 100 and 121, PHYS 100
and 151,
GEOL 101, ENV 100, and BIOL 190. This role is currently being expanded by offering
upperdivision
courses for GBC’s bachelor’s degrees where needed, both for general
education and for the
needs of specific programs. This includes regularly offering an upper-division
physical science course
(AMS 320) for the BAS program, and rotating between the physical science and
biology in offering
the upper-division Integrative Science Seminar (INT 369). Coursework for a
proposed natural resource
management degree may be offered in the upper division, including courses in
the areas of
geomorphology and nonrenewable natural resources. The department also offers
key pre-nursing
biology courses: BIOL 190, 223, 224, and 251.
Another role of the department
is to provide courses required for the needs of technical-vocational
programs. In the past, PHYS 100 has been used for this purpose, but a new
technical physics course,
PHYS 107, has been developed and is now being offered regularly. The department
also provides
courses of more advanced or divergent nature, for general interest or professional
development. These
include special topics courses on a range of subjects, usually in geology
or mining.
Faculty. The qualifications
of the physical science faculty have been upgraded significantly. Ten
years ago, there were two full-time faculty (both with master’s degrees)
for all of the sciences. Now
there are two full-time faculty with PhDs in physical science. One has a PhD
in physics and covers
physics and chemistry courses. One has a PhD in geology and covers earth science
and physics; both
collaborate on seminars. Also, a full time faculty member has been present
in Winnemucca to help
deliver chemistry courses to the centers outside of Elko. The number of biology
faculty has also
increased. There are now three full-time tenure track instructors, all with
master’s degrees in biology.
One of the three teaches at the Winnemucca branch campus. The Elko faculty
alternate the
curriculum schedule in such a way that each instructor is teaching a different
set of courses each year,
a practice designed to maintain instructional “freshness.”
There
is an excellent core of physical science adjunct faculty who are invaluable
for teaching courses,
especially outside of Elko. They are qualified, reliable, and experienced.
On the other hand, it is
extremely difficult to recruit masters qualified instructors for biology courses
in Elko and throughout
the service area. The difference in recruiting is probably explained by the
mining industry’s preponderance
of professionals trained in the physical sciences (e.g., geology) who live
in the region.
There are simply more physical science graduates in northeastern Nevada than
biology graduates.
FACULTY
Instructor Name |
Education |
Title |
GBC Years of Service |
| Peter Bagley |
BS—University
of Maryland
MS—University of Kentucky |
Biology Professor |
7 |
| Gary Hanington |
BS/MS—SUNY at
Stony Brook
PhD—University of California, San Diego |
Chemistry/Physics
Instructor |
2 |
| Doug Hogan |
BA/MS—California
State Polytechnic University |
Biology/Chemistry
Instructor
Winnemucca Campus |
1 |
| Mike McFarlane |
AB—Humboldt
State University
MS/PhD—University of Nevada, Reno |
Physical Sciences
Professor |
19 |
| Mark Ports |
BS—Oklahoma
State University
MS—Fort Hays University |
Biology Professor
Department Chair |
19 |
Science faculty are involved directly with student advising. All students
majoring in a field of science
are encouraged to visit an adviser every semester to select their courses.
One faculty from the science
area also sits on the Teacher Education Committee. One of the science faculty
has also been heavily
involved in presenting the college student orientation at the beginning of
each semester.
The science faculty has demonstrated recent leadership through the work of
Dr. McFarlane as the
prime mover in the general education revision and as temporary lead faculty
for the BAS program.
Professor Peter Bagley is serving as the chair of the Faculty Senate for
2002-2003.
Students. Enrollment
in physical science courses for general education has shifted in the last
six
years from less than 50 percent to over 60 percent of the total. Science transfer
courses have remained
about the same at about 12-14 percent, and vocational-related courses have
dropped from as high as
16 percent in the past to 11 percent in the last year. Enrollment in “other” courses
(general interest,
professional development, etc.) has dropped from almost 30 percent six years
ago to less than 15
percent in the last year.
Enrollment in biology courses has increased by 50-75
percent since the last accreditation study. For
example, enrollment in the core biology courses (BIOL 100, 190, 191, 223,
224, 251) has increased
from 183 students in 1996-1997 to 273 students in 2001-02. Nursing and elementary
education
students comprise a major percentage of students taking the core courses.
Resources. The facilities for teaching all sciences at GBC have improved
over the last several years.
A storage room has been constructed at the back of Lundberg Hall for better
and safer chemical
storage. This has, in turn, opened up more storage space for other equipment
and supplies for the
physical sciences. The sciences have acquired more equipment, especially
physics, and now have more
space to store it. The new microbiology lab in the High Tech Center is an
excellent facility. Moving
this lab from Lundberg Hall opened more space for the chemistry lab. In the
future, it would be
more efficient for instruction if separate facilities could be found for
physics and the earth sciences,
but space is adequate at the present. There has generally been an adequate
budget for purchasing
equipment and supplies in the physical sciences, although keeping up-to-date
computers is hampered
by a system policy that prevents the purchase of computers with departmental
equipment funds.
The Biology Department currently uses the older lab in Lundberg
Hall for the freshman courses and
the new lab in the High Tech Center for the sophomore level courses. New
microscopes were
purchased in 2001 for microbiology and human anatomy and physiology. New
computers and
software are needed to replace outdated software and computers.
Another important
personnel upgrade was adding the position of laboratory manager two years
ago, a
full-time professional staff member whose duties are lab management and lab
prep. The lab manager
works with physical science and biology professors, though the priority is
biology. However, the
service has been especially helpful for chemistry, with inventory and disposal
control for the
chemicals. The lab manager is also responsible for maintaining live cultures
and the coordination of
labs outside of Elko.
Significant Changes
Enrollment trends. There has been a definite shift in courses that are offered
in the physical sciences
at GBC over the last several years, shifts that have largely resulted from
a downturn in the mining
industry and the beginning of GBC’s baccalaureate degree programs. The
drop in enrollment related
to the decline in the local mining industry has been offset by increases in
enrollment in the liberal
arts-oriented courses, relating directly to the new four-year programs. The
total enrollment in the
physical sciences has remained relatively flat over the last six years.
The
major change has been a heavier emphasis on the delivery of general education
courses. PHYS
100 now serves as a program requirement for the elementary education program;
the acceptance of
the GEOL 101-102 sequence as an option in the elementary education science
endorsement has
made Historical Geology, GEOL 102 a viable course for the first time. The
department has also begun
offering Technical Physics, PHYS 107 regularly for vocational areas, providing
an option for these
programs other than PHYS 100 (oriented toward the liberal arts). There is
now an upper-division
physical science course (AMS 320) for the BAS program as a program requirement.
As mentioned,
the physical science and biology professors rotate in offering integrative
seminars.
Part of the change in course offerings in the physical sciences is that some
courses that used to
provide strong enrollments rarely can be taught now due to low enrollment.
These include Rocks and
Minerals, GEOL 130; Basic Prospecting, GEOL 135; Geology of Nevada, GEOL
201; Basic Ore
Deposits, GEOL 210; Introduction to Mining, MINE 101; Mining Law, MINE 251;
and
Environmental Law, MINE 253. These reflect a general decline in the local
mining industry. This
department also oversaw a mining technology program (AAS with laboratory
and engineering
technician emphases) as of the last accreditation visit, which was dropped
because of low enrollment.
This once successful program saturated the local market for these technicians.
Biology
enrollment has significantly increased due primarily to the education bachelor’s
degree, a robust number of students wanting to enter the nursing program, and
an overall
increase in general
education students. Enrollment in the core courses, as mentioned, has increased
50 percent. There are
some interesting and troubling dynamics in the courses. Failure to complete
these courses remains a
problem as each course loses 20-35 percent of enrolled students before the
end of the course, with a
particularly high rate of loss (32 percent) in Human Anatomy and Physiology
I, BIOL 223. One example
of correcting this dropout rate is the new requirement of BIOL 190 before a
student can enroll
in the more difficult BIOL 223. Because of the bachelor’s degree requirements,
there has been a shift
from BIOL 100 to BIOL190. But there is a failure to capture BIOL 190 non-majors
for BIOL 191.
Another enrollment trend shown in the table below is toward more full-time
students with declared
science majors. The table also shows that nearly 60 percent of our declared
science majors are female.
Enrollment of Declared Science Majors |
| Semester |
FTE |
Head count |
Full Time |
% FT |
Female |
% Female |
Male |
% Male |
| Fall 1996 |
47 |
95 |
25 |
26.3 |
53 |
55.8 |
42 |
44.2 |
| Spring 1997 |
50.1 |
105 |
27 |
25.7 |
64 |
61.0 |
41 |
39.0 |
| Fall 1997 |
63.6 |
111 |
34 |
30.6 |
63 |
56.8 |
49 |
44.1 |
| Spring 1998 |
55.1 |
101 |
33 |
32.7 |
56 |
55.4 |
45 |
44.6 |
| Fall 1998 |
77 |
129 |
53 |
41.1 |
78 |
60.5 |
51 |
39.5 |
| Spring 1999 |
77.4 |
135 |
54 |
40.0 |
80 |
59.3 |
55 |
40.7 |
| Fall 1999 |
77.4 |
117 |
56 |
47.9 |
69 |
59.0 |
51 |
43.6 |
| Spring 2000 |
67.2 |
113 |
54 |
47.8 |
65 |
57.5 |
48 |
42.5 |
| Fall 2000 |
75.1 |
123 |
51 |
41.5 |
72 |
58.5 |
51 |
41.5 |
| Spring 2001 |
67.4 |
117 |
42 |
38.2 |
70 |
57.3 |
50 |
42.7 |
| Fall 2001 |
66.4 |
110 |
42 |
38.2 |
70 |
63.6 |
40 |
36.4 |
| |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
58.6 |
|
41.7 |
Design and implementation of curriculum. In Spring 2002, the Science Department
reviewed its
broad curricular goals. These four major goals were selected and are listed
below:
•
Students majoring in science fields will learn the principles of physical and
life sciences to
successfully transfer into upper-division bachelor’s programs.
• Students within applied fields will gain sufficient competency in scientific
disciplines that
principles can be used in technological applications.
• Students will acquire awareness and ability within the general education
objectives, with a
special emphasis on critical thinking.
•
Students in GBC’s bachelor’s programs will acquire an interdisciplinary
foundation in
appropriate sciences to succeed in their chosen fields.
(Exhibit 2.33 contains sample student outcomes for these four broad goals.)
Student
outcomes and evaluation. In addressing the expectations listed above,
some of the science
curriculum is being presented in a slightly different format than before. This
is primarily because of
the new general education objectives. All courses listed in the general education “list” must
meet all of
the general education objectives listed in the catalog. While maintaining the
same standards for the
presentation of science (e.g., using the scientific method), the courses now
include elements relating
to the social sciences, humanities, etc., including computational and strong
communications
components. Those courses counting toward general education requirements now
include more
outside reading and oral presentations. Determining the effectiveness of the
general education courses
in the physical sciences will be vital. However, early response from the students
has been positive.
They are putting out good effort and appreciate having topics that overlap
into areas outside of
science.
Another effect from the change in the general education format has
been to focus on the delivery of
fewer, higher quality courses. As a small college, GBC cannot afford to offer
a large number of
courses with small enrollments. The College is opting to put more students
into fewer courses and
maintaining high standards within those courses. The addition of new faculty
with better
qualifications is also strengthening the quality of the courses.
Analysis
There are major challenges teaching physical science at GBC. It is difficult
to predict enrollment
trends and which courses are going to attract enrollment. With the new general
education objectives,
it takes more time to prepare and evaluate work in these courses. Also, new
upper-division courses
require more time to prepare and evaluate to an even greater degree. Faculty
workload does not take
into consideration these factors, and faculty hit “burn-out” every
semester. To cover the diversity of
science courses needed for academic integrity, two physical science instructors
teach within the
departmental prefixes of astronomy, chemistry, geography, geology, physics,
as well as the integrative
seminars; in addition, both instructors back-fill their schedules with math
courses. Similarly, the
biology faculty carry a significant number of preparations, including standard
lower-division courses
as well as the new upper-division offerings in environmental science, integrative
seminars, and, in the
near future, a zoology course. The teaching loads have implications for future
faculty recruiting.
Attracting highly qualified instructors to Elko can be difficult in light of
the work load and the wide
range of courses that must be taught.
STRENGTHS
• Physical science instructors with the background to teach a range of
topics, able to see the
connections between and among the physical science disciplines.
• Biology faculty with broad experience and strong teaching background
with the ability to teach
a range of subjects successfully.
• Instructors not narrowly focused and driven by research, but participate
in individual research
on their own as a source of invigoration.
• Relatively small class sizes, allowing time for attention to individual
students.
• Labs taught by the instructors, not teaching assistants.
• Instructors readily accessible for helping students.
• Improved facilities, particularly the new laboratory in the High Tech
Center.
CHALLENGES
• Instructors sometimes strung out too thin by teaching too many topics,
and not able to keep on
top of all recent developments.
• The present work load hampers adequate preparation for upper-division
courses.
• More lab/storage space is needed to separate physics from earth sciences.
• Computing capacity for department is not fully developed.
• Lack of adequate materials and equipment for biology.
RECOMMENDATIONS/ACTION
ITEMS
•
Adjust the workload policy and budgeting formula in light of the new mission
for bachelor’s
degrees.
• Acquire new space for a physics lab and the storage of equipment.
• Acquire more computers for use in all science labs.
• Increase funds for new equipment and computers for laboratory use.
•
Increase the number of 300-400 level courses to accommodate the bachelor’s
program needs. |